The Ripun Bora Syndrome

The Ripun Bora Syndrome

How many ministers, and even the rest of the MLAs or MPs, do not belong to the upper economic class? One should find out what they get as salary, what they can acquire as assets with that salary, and what they really acquire

Bikash Sarmah

It should not have taken a Ripun Bora to shake the conscience of the people of Assam. Corruption and other forms of immorality are nothing new in this land of ours. There have been several instances in the past to prompt us into questioning the very need for democracy and the so-called welfare state if our leaders find it far more convenient to act as monarchs after being elected by the people. There have been instances that reflect on the ease with which our elected representatives manipulate the course of investigation against them and trample on the law of the land, and on their remarkable ability to win elections without performing anything at all — and despite the fraud they commit on the electorate. Therefore, the Ripun Bora episode is no big surprise. But there is something disturbing. It is the increasing frequency with which politicians are trying to buy their image by bribing those who matter, as also the increasing frequency with which those who matter are willing to be sold at fancy prices.In the wake of the arrest of the sacked Assam Education Minister, this newspaper has received several letters from its readers expressing shock and dismay over the incident. It is as if all of a sudden a realization has dawned upon them all as to the very destiny of their State in the hands of the political species who they have elected to serve them. The letters, which this newspaper has already published, have one thing in common: knowledge of how the elected representatives have served — or would serve — them and of how easy it is for the powers-that-be to influence the course of law and justice. Some of the letters point to the ‘‘taint’’ in the Gogoi cabinet and how the ‘‘tainted ministers’’ continue to enjoy protection from the Chief Minister himself because they are either his trusted lieutenants or extremely powerful on their own.What is surprising is the propensity of the people to react only after the inevitable has happened, and not when their sustained reaction and activism in the past could have worked out wonders for them and their society. It is amusing that only after the arrest of Ripun Bora the people should wake up and even spot the ‘‘taint’’ in the Gogoi ministry when it is common knowledge who is what — right when Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi was forming his Council of Ministers, whether in 2001 or in 2006. So why this sudden awakening? To show that we are all alive and kicking as conscious citizens?This is not to even remotely suggest that people should not react when they have the scope and reason to react to episodes such as Ripun Bora’s. What I am trying to argue is that Ripun Bora cannot be so sudden a provocation when you already know the extent of criminalization of politics and politicization of crime in your beloved State. How many letters have people written to different newspapers about Ripun Bora between the day when the Gauhati High Court directed the CBI to investigate into the murder of Daniel Topno and the day when Bora was arrested by the CBI in New Delhi for attempting to bribe a CBI officer investigating the case? How many columnists have written pieces in different newspapers on Ripun Bora and his alleged involvement in the murder of Topno between the two days? We were all sleeping in utter bliss. Now of course we are smart citizens.It should not have taken so long to wake up and see the scheme of things that Dispur would anyway design. Here you have mostly leaders whose merit is not the virtue of being great democracy practitioners but the power of money and muscle that democracy seems to have sanctioned and legitimized for the sake of their sustenance — so that they may preside over our destiny only to take us closer to our doomsday every passing day. It should not have taken the people of the State a Ripun Bora to have a feel of Dispur as it is now, when they know it pretty well how even cheats and thugs can make a fortune in the profession of politics in this wondrous country. How many of us do not know that even if one fails in all spheres of life he has absolutely no reason to worry provided he has money and muscle power, because there is the profession of politics to absorb and reward him suitably? How many of us do not know that there is no place for saints in politics even though it is this politics that has helped sinners transform into ‘saints’ overnight?One may call it ‘‘Ripun Bora syndrome’’: the tendency of elected representatives to mould the state machinery to their own advantage, given the high success rate in the field; the tendency to make the law of the land subservient to them and their relatives; and the tendency, therefore, to break all laws — and also because as lawmakers they think the various laws they make should not exist for, and be applicable to, them and it is only the hoi polloi who should be bound by the laws. T here is another aspect of the Ripun Bora syndrome. It is the belief of powerful politicians that they are the state and, therefore, its resources are theirs, which means they think they have the divine right to loot the state exchequer and bleed the state dry. How many ministers, and even the rest of the MLAs or MPs, do not belong to the upper economic class? One should find out what they get as salary, what they can acquire as assets with that salary, and what they really acquire. One should find out how disproportionate their wealth is to their known sources of income.Is the Ripun Bora syndrome inevitable in the present scheme of things? It is inevitable, as many would argue, because people have no choice but to elect someone from the lot who are just the ones, as the people themselves know, who will not serve them because their commitment is not to the people but to their own interests. However, the people are at complete liberty to opt for a seemingly undemocratic practice — that of not at all exercising their right to franchise when they see there is none to cast their valuable votes for. This is the only option when democracy fails the people. This is the only option for the sake of a new democracy. Let the message, loud and clear, go to the candidates and the political parties they belong to that they do not deserve democratic mandate because they do not deserve to go to the august House of the people if they face allegations of crime and corruption and, despite this, if they want to be lawmakers.The tragedy of Assam is its people, their attitude, the lack of meaningful activism among them, and their inability to sustain whatever activism they help fashion. Going back to the reactions that have come after the arrest of the former State Education Minister, the question is not of the kind or intensity of reactions but one of their sustainability. There should be a sustained campaign against all forms of corruption in politics and its criminalization. But where is activism by citizens? Where are individuals to lead them? Even after the Ripun Bora disgrace, has anyone seen citizens’ groups or civil society groups staging demonstrations against the alleged taint in the government of the day? Or do the civil society groups in Assam exist solely for the protection of human rights of ‘insurgents’?Ripun Bora’s is not an isolated case. It is part of a continuum whose genesis lies in the manner in which politics is practised in India and in the indifference of the people to both criminalization of politics and politicization of crime. Ripun Bora’s is a manifestation of a kind of politics where the people remain resigned to their fate as decided by the politicians because they do not want to counter the might of ‘their’ leaders since they are either timid or unconcerned. It is the people who are responsible for the Ripun Bora syndrome. What have the people of Gohpur to say? And of Tezpur too, if one is talk of MK Subba? Source: sentinel assam